This is a story of why we always say you have to verify your copyright registration, if anyone else says verbally or contractually that they are doing it for you.  Ed received a request for assistance from another lawyer who (unlike Ed) was “shocked that such a thing could happen”. Seems that the lawyer’s client, a medium sized publisher of books and magazines had failed to register any of their publications that went to market over a “multi-year stretch of time”.  These books and publications contained intellectual property in the forms of photos, illustrations, articles, novels and non-fiction works, only a small portion of which was owned by the publisher.  The overwhelming majority of the images and verbiage came from independent creators.

In some cases there is “some paperwork” reflecting the publisher’s obligation to obtain registration(s).  In some instances the creators had previously or subsequent to publication, filed their own registrations for the works “independent” of their use in one of these publications. In still other instances, a proper contract requiring the publisher to obtain a copyright registration was in place but the publisher had (for whatever reason) simply done nothing.   All of the publications say “Copyright XYZ” – or something similar.  Bottom line, this attorney walked into a nightmare of a disorganized client.

We bring this to your attention to bang home once again our oft told warning that you must verify that your publisher has in fact filed for and obtained a registration for a work in which your intellectual property appears.  If your publishing contract requires such filing be made by the publisher, it should also require that you be furnished with a copy of the registration to prove that such filing has in fact been made.

Publishers, notwithstanding the fact that most have in house lawyers or IP people on payroll, like creatives screw up too.  Some more often than others.  Don’t assume that your publisher has in fact filed and obtained a registration simply because your contract with the publisher obligates it to do so.  These situations are far from unusual.  Under these scenarios an expedited (“special handling”) registration filing is necessary to sue an infringer.  The Copyright Office charges a fee some 20 times greater for this “rush job” than a standard filing.  The failure of the publisher to register may have serious consequences to your ability to bring an action for infringement.  If the publisher is out of business, you might have no one to sue for a serious breach of contract resulting in your loss of a claim and/or money.   All of this aggravation is easily avoidable.

So if you have any of your photos or artwork registered by a publisher, agent, stock agency, or anyone that you thought was registering your work for you, you might want to double check that those registrations were made, and made in your name.

One more item: consider the plight of the publisher who having failed to register, loses various remedies and rights if, as and when its works are infringed.

Jack and Ed