Perhaps lost in the wake of the passing of Steve Jobs was the loss of Goskin Siphhioglu. Our guess is that his name is known to 1% of maybe 1% of the American public…maybe.
A noted photojournalist in his own right, he went on to found Sipa Press. Sipa was one of a handful of other stock photography agencies that covered world news events when to do so meant that photojournalists had to possess an almost mystical recipe of talent, work ethic, knowledge of place and people, the ability to BS their way into a war zone or out of a jail, a willingness to risk life and limb to get a picture and a hefty helping of flat out insanity. Dramatic imagery that became the pages of Life, Look, Time and the other magazines were the lifeblood of the news and imagery to America. The world was their canvass and their work was often legendary.
Photo access to war zones or even to streets seething with discontent in far off lands, was restricted. There was an Iron Curtain of censorship and bullets flying in Europe, in the deserts of the Middle East and in the jungles of Viet Nam. Back then there were no cell phones, iPads, digital nor camcorders in the possession of millions of wanna-be photographers or just plain citizens making instant world-wide access to imagery both routine and “free”. There was no Facebook, twitter or e-mails. And absolutely no – if you can imagine it – Internet. If you care about either photography or reportage, Goksin Sipahioglu’s passing is depressing for reasons both obvious and subtle.
It is a sad fact of life that the public could not care less about photojournalists who daily risk their lives or liberty to capture breaking stories. Amateurs both domestically and abroad, now shoot imagery that instantly appears on screens of all sizes and shapes and passes for news photography. Other than Danial Pearl, it is not likely than many Americans can name a single journalist or photojournalist who has been killed in action. (Perhaps if Angelina Jolie had passed on the movie, the American public may have by now, forgotten even Mr. Pearl’s name).
Sipahioglu’s death is a sad and obvious reminder of an era past but also a subtle reminder that professional photojournalists are no longer considered to be an essential cog in the dissemination of events and news to a waiting world. A pro with twenty years experience of shooting and living in say, Libya, has been easily replaced by a 17-year-old native with an iPhone who “works for free”.
“All that matters is the image and what fee it can command in the market place”.
Just ask any twenty something who works for any of the big name stock agencies and that’s what they believe and that’s what they have been told to believe by their superiors. Few if any, have ever even heard of “Sipa”. Mores the pity.
Some will say, “It’s all just progress…what’s the big deal”. We think its a very big deal. It is emblematic of the near extinction of professional photojournalism as a viable profession. Society is diminished yet again.
#1 by Adrienne Usher on October 7, 2011 - 11:04 pm
well written, sad and thought provoking.
#2 by Matt Timmons on October 9, 2011 - 9:16 pm
In the case of stock photo agencies and big businesses that would just as soon sell cheap frozen hamburgers as they would photography, then yes, this is a true instance of advancing technology actually diminishing an aspect of quality in our lives.
But I believe that so long as there are publications like The Guardian and Nat Geo, we will continue to see the highest quality photo work not attainable by the teenager with a camera phone. That is, so long as there are those who enjoy that quality and will purchase those publications.
#3 by Jack and Ed on October 9, 2011 - 11:38 pm
Matt,
Have you spoken to any National Geo photographers? I know several and it’s not like it was. Assignments that were given 6-8 weeks are now 3 weeks. Budgets that included 2 helicopters if needed are now “Did you need that Taxi ride?”
And while you mention two great magazines, a lot of the bread and butter magazines are no longer around. Or pay nothing.
Read this blog article by Nick Turpin
http://www.sevensevennine.com/?p=3093
The beginning of it is very enlightening. Nick, like many photojournalists today are looking for other revenue streams.
One high profile National Geo shooter recently said that some people were shocked as to how little the magazine paid him. Lecturing and workshops pay him much more.
That teenager with a camera phone may be the only one taking photos if professionals keep getting squeezed out. People have to put food on their table.
Jack
#4 by Matt Timmons on October 13, 2011 - 10:07 am
Hi Jack,
I haven’t spoken to any, but I know that when I go to the book store I see tons of magazines with great photos, and those travel mags are always full of beautiful images. Now of course I agree that I’ve heard that they aren’t paying like the used to, but other than the economy we have right now not allowing the magazines to charge what they used to for advertising, the digital camera/technology revolution has made it so that anyone can afford to get a great camera, hence tons more photographers, which brings cut throat competition for jobs, which brings lower wages. If those publications resort to free photographers, then they risk losing their readership altogether with the lack of quality that comes with cheap/free photographers. I’m with ya, we all want to get paid an not see a decline, it’s just that any business is going to save a buck anytime it can. When a seasoned pro with a high day rate is standing next to an unemployed guy with an EOS Rebel and some decent Photoshop skills for a fraction of that rate, a business cutting back is going to follow the path of least costs- to a point.
I’ll read the article and I hope to see you and Ed sometime soon. Cheers.
#5 by Jack Reznicki on October 13, 2011 - 11:27 am
@Matt T wrote: “When a seasoned pro with a high day rate is standing next to an unemployed guy with an EOS Rebel and some decent Photoshop skills for a fraction of that rate, a business cutting back is going to follow the path of least costs- to a point.”
Matt,
What’s even more scary than that, is not the talent difference, it’s that the level of what is now acceptable to run has lowered. I’ve seen this for years. I once bid an ad campaign and they thought the price was so high, they ran the art directors comp layout images, done roughly, mistakes and all. I guess they thought the crudeness of it was a “style” or hip. It was just dog ugly.
But now acceptable because it was cheap.
Jack
#6 by Matt Timmons on October 13, 2011 - 3:04 pm
I hear ya, and I see it in smaller markets with fashion advertising. Jewelry stores are “hiring” their son-in-law who has a camera, their teenage niece to be the model, putting their jewelry on her and shooting an ad in their living room, then putting it on a billboard. The results are so hilarious, but also sad because they don’t seem to mind at all that it looks so pathetic on every level, just that it was free.
#7 by georgetheatheist on October 17, 2011 - 3:47 pm
Goksin Sipahioglu OR Goskin Siphhioglu ???
#8 by David and Gennie Williams on October 11, 2015 - 9:09 am
A generous gentleman whom we met and sometimes partied with in
Paris in 1972-73 when we were students. His lady friend, Anna Lisa lane
From Denmark was charming and likewise generous to we young
Students. We travel to Paris every few years and always remember
goksin and his Mustang, Anna lisavin her Mini what happened to Anne
Marieand Kristina?