Your invoices for advertising or promotional work should always, always specify the identity of both the client and the product or service being photographed. So for example the license you grant via your invoice should typically read (in part): Product “2010 Ford Mustang Convertible” Client: “Ford Motor Company”. Usage: “Point of purchase brochures in North American Ford Dealerships only”. No assignment or transfer of the license to any other entity without your permission.
Simple enough. By so doing you avoid a host of scenarios whereby use which exceeds the license intended, could occur. Here’s a little twist to the “know your client rule”. The following is a true story. The names, products and industry have been made up to protect the guilty.
You are approached by a representative of a non-profit, charity named “Sober America”. The charity’s mission statement talks about keeping people who wrestle with alcoholism, sober. It talks about links with doctors who can help with treating people who are alcoholics and so on. You agree to terms on a job which will consist of X number of images of liquor bottles, perhaps a location shot of a “skid row” and a long shot of an enormous cemetery with row after row of headstones. Big job and a good fee seem to be in your future.
You agree on all the essential terms and conditions and everything is a go but at the very last second your client phones you. “We have a problem”, she says. “Our lawyer needs an additional tiny, little clause that says, ‘If Sober America should go out of business and/or just wants its current partners or affiliates to use the images during the license term, it can”. “We don’t think this is going to happen but the lawyer says we need it just in case”. Doesn’t sound like a big deal does it? The money is so close you can taste it. So you give it about 1/8 of a second of thought and say, “Sure, no problem”.
What you didn’t/don’t know is that while “Sober America” is indeed a charity, it is “partnered” with a drug company which advertises, sells and promotes a drug used to battle alcoholism. Sober America is in effect a “not for profit” marketing arm of Big Pharma, Inc. a Fortune 10 company which in effect, owns “Sober America” lock, stock and barrel. In reality Sober America is funded and employed by Big Pharma for the sole reason of selling its drugs and funneling patients to doctors who prescribe Big Pharma’s anti-alcoholism drug.
Now maybe you have no problem with the fact that in the end and on balance, you are doing your part to fight alcoholism. Maybe you have no opinion nor could care less about who is going to use your images so long as you get paid on time. Fine, but in any case you have set your fees and licensing terms predicated on the representation that Sober America is a not for profit charity.
Tsk, tsk my friend, you have been had. Remember how you let yourself feel just a little (or alot) guilty when estimating for a charity? In fact, you have shot a job for Big Pharma, Inc.and could have and should have, charged accordingly.
Not for profit or non-profit is a tax status for that entity. Unless you are doing work with a charity that you know well and are personally involved with, do not assume that your fees or offer of licensing rights should be affected because your client informs you it is a “not for profit” entity.
#1 by RIchard Katris on April 13, 2010 - 1:26 pm
IN a similar vein…I have a small start up company that I billed a lower amount to, that subsequently went bankrupt…and was bought by a large national firm…who’s lawyers promptly informed me that they now owned all rights to the photos ….any restrictions you can place on future usage and different owners is to be considered as well.
My current solution to this problem is to NOT sell any rights with unlimited terms for usage. All licensing is for a yearly period (or 5 year period) only…which limits subsequent “owners” of the company to renegotiating subsequent usages at rates that are appropriate to the size of the company and any new intended usages.
#2 by admin on April 14, 2010 - 8:36 am
You mentioned bankruptcy but left out the details. Our upcoming book goes into detail about how to prevent your work from being used if A. you have not been paid in full and/or B your client files for protection under the bankruptcy laws. If your license is properly drafted limited to your client and not assignable, your client can not sell or permit a third party to use your images nor can the bankruptcy court permit that to happen if you have not been paid in full. Yet another reason to register your images. Such use by a third party would constitute copyright infringement. The copyright laws and the bankruptcy laws are both federal and equal to each other. Neither court can “overrule the other”. Bottom line, if your paperwork is in order, pay attention to any legal proceedings and you have not been paid, a bankruptcy filing can not serve to permit a third party to use or “own” your images. We will do more on this topic next week.
Ed
#3 by Joseph Pobereskin on May 9, 2010 - 8:21 am
My first job shooting was for a non-profit: Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts. I charged ’em!